1st, i muz apologise to ppl hu will feel offended by me typing this post. i'm gonna raise sth controversial, pls dun read the following if u dowan to. but i muz sae, i'm neither sexist nor feminist. and this is a very big and hasty generalisation.

------------------------------------------------------

as i was toking to one of my relatives juz now, he raised certain interesting, but controversial points. u c, they sae when ? is in a relationship b4, it has lowered ?'s value. in a sense. like e.g. if ? sex b4, u will not want ? as ur wife/husband or sth. so after ? has been in relationship, it show that ? has let down ?'s defences once. so, ?'s "value" has decreased. this will lead to ? becoming promiscuous, at least many a time, not all cases.

this relative also said, if + turn successful at 25-30 years old, + bound to attract millions of ?. but at 17-20 yr, if + succesful, no ? will like +. too smart alr. everyone hates + cos the ? are still competing wif +. but my relative claims there will be a time when ? will realise they oso nid a + to depend on and a + to provide for them, and the clever + will have ability provide for ?s.

but i hav certain reservations on this. nowadays, ? seem to hav turned more independent. "i no nid +", they claim, even at 30 years old. many claim they do not nid +. sometimes i question this to a large extent. why suddenly do s'pore society seem to notice a surge in 27-35 year old ? going to dating agencies? including +. i reckon + oso surge to some extent, probably for a different reason.

anyway, i have excluded the point of that type of magical love. here is more towards pragmatic man-woman relationships. in true love, whether the man or woman is unfaithful or sex b4, they still can b in relationship.

---------------------------------------

maybe, a little more radical views here. the whole idea of gender equality is freakin difficult if u tink about it. a fat + can get a ? provided + show + is a capable. a fat ? has 0.000000001% chance of finding a +. a + can flirt wif millions of ?, then get a ? and settle down well in a loving relationship that lasts. a ? had a relationship, broke up, and then ? has low chance of finding another, so ? turns promiscuous. gender equality seems difficult. i hav to admit. as much as we are reaching a point where + and ? get some equality on many aspects, it is difficult to reach the point where everyting is homogenuous.

once upon a time, if u do read some evolution, u will find that ancestral humans has full sexism and totalitarianism. now we try to reverse such a sexism and totalitarianism... i duno whether it will come true. but as far as possible, sexism shld b reduced so that all man and women can do their best for the society, but i somehow feel all men and women shld not b too obsessed wif themselves and pls contribute to their countries' future generation. what is a country wif everyone working and with no next generation to carry on their prosperity?

conclusion. if u noe the song. what the world, needs now, is love sweet love. haiz. it's the only thing, there's juz too little of.